Iran’s Strategic Victory
Posted: May 29, 2026 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Abraham Accords, Drone Warfare, Iran, Israel, JCPOA, Lebanon, Memorandum of Understanding, Middle East, Policy Strategy Mismatch, Russia, Strait of Hormuz Leave a commentA billboard in downtown Tehran depicting Donald J. Trump with his lips stitched together in a symbolic illustration of the closed Strait of Hormuz. (Reuters)
For several days now, there have been rumors of a “deal” between Iran and the U.S. In diplomatic terms, there is no such thing as a deal. There are treaties, agreements, alliances, and a host of other official documents that exist under international law. In truth, the Trump administration calls the agreement a Memorandum of Understanding or MOU. A MOU — and this one is supposedly one page — is not how wars end. A MOU is more like a concept of a plan and in fact, this one calls for a continued ceasefire for sixty days while the actual terms are hammered out. One thing is for sure, Trump has no idea what he is doing and he is giving the word “deal” a bad connotation. Last Saturday Trump said they were close to an agreement. On Sunday he said that they were not close. On Monday we attacked targets in Iran, allegedly in self-defense, but contrary to the existing ceasefire. Then we learned that the negotiators have come to terms but as of this writing, neither the leadership in Iran nor Trump have agreed to it. Wednesday the two sides exchanged attacks.
It is hard to assess whether the U.S. achieved its strategic goals because they were never articulated, other than vague announcements that Iran must give up their “nuclear dust” (enriched uranium). Or was it his declaration that he would accept nothing less than Iran’s “unconditional surrender?” Or was it that he was going to select “acceptable” new leaders in Iran — regime change? Or was it to destroy all of their ballistic missiles? (Intelligence assessments made public indicate Iran has about 70% of their arsenal intact.) Or was it “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again”? Or anything else that happens to pop into his head.
In my view, the Iranians scored a resounding strategic victory that puts the U.S. on its heels around the globe. Historically, this could be the turning point where the U.S. goes from being a global leader to becoming a regional power. It will be the end of American dominance enjoyed since the end of World War II. There are multiple reasons as to why we will look back on this war of choice as a disaster bigger than Viet Nam or Afghanistan.
What is in the agreement? As I write, that is unclear. Both the U.S. and Iran have publicly discussed different elements of the MOU and the parts do not often match. It appears that it will extend the current (almost) ceasefire for another sixty days. During those sixty days, talks would continue for a more permanent agreement. At some point, and right now it looks like after the sixty days, nuclear talks would begin as to the disposition of the Iranian program. There are very little specifics. The Strait of Hormuz, which was open before Trump initiated the conflict, would reopen. The U.S. blockade of the Gulf and Iranian ports would end. Additionally some sanctions against Iran would be lifted and some amount of frozen assets (pallets of money?) released. In other words, we will be worse off, Iran will be better off, after hostilities cease. President Obama’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) hammered out with the P-5+1 (the five permanent members of the U.N Security Council plus Germany) and Iran to curtail Iran’s nuclear program was a much more fruitful and impactful agreement. Critically, that plan included intrusive inspectors to monitor compliance. Trump tore it up. The MOU makes no mention of inspectors which makes any discussion of the nuclear program meaningless unless inspectors are given unrestricted access.
As the talks progressed this week, out of nowhere, Trump invoked the Abraham Accords and demanded that all of the Muslim countries sign on as part of the MOU. The Abraham Accords are a series of agreements, brokered by the U.S. between Israel and Muslim and Arab majority states. Egypt and Jordan have had relations with Israel since 1979 and 1994 respectively. UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan have joined the Accords since 2020. Complicating the picture is Palestine. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states plus Pakistan and others will not establish diplomatic relations with Israel until the Israelis commit to a two state solution for the Palestinians. The Israelis, or more specifically Benjamin Netanyahu, refuses. Analysts speculate that Trump threw in that proposal to try and salvage what is going to clearly be a major failure on his part if the MOU goes forward. Should he stick to that requirement, it will prevent agreement on the MOU.
Remember that Israel is conducting military operations in Lebanon against Hezbollah, a proxy of Iran’s. Iran declared that fighting in Lebanon must be included in any settlement or ceasefire. Israel declared that Lebanon and Iran are two distinct issues and that any agreement with Iran does not include Lebanon. This is but one of many complicating factors preventing a permanent agreement and thus the MOU. Additionally, Netanyahu is against any agreement that does not eliminate Iran’s nuclear programs upfront, before the war ends.
One of the biggest lessons learned is the changing nature of warfare. If nothing else, Ukraine and now Iran have demonstrated that a militarily inferior nation can hold out against a much larger and better equipped nation. One big reason is drones. Clearly a Tomahawk surface to surface missile is a more powerful weapon than a relatively cheap drone. But warfare in the modern era is not just about who has the biggest guns. It is economic warfare as well as combat. We have a finite number of expensive precision offensive munitions and our defenses are finite and expensive. Iran can quickly and cheaply churn out a nearly unlimited supply of drones. Are cheap drones sufficient for today’s warfare? No. But if the future of warfare is drones, then Hegseth’s and Trump’s infatuation with a manly non-woke military is a distraction from what really counts. Trump and Hegseth want to take us back to the 1990s with big platforms like the Trump battleship or the F-47 stealth fighter (Trump thinks it is named after him as the 47th president). Those programs cost tens of billions of dollars. One Trump battleship is estimated to cost at least 20 billion dollars (while we are going back to the future, why not propel the ship with big, beautiful coal which Trump seems to want to use to power everything). For example, one Tomahawk missile costs about 2 million dollars launched from a multi-billion dollar platform manned by hundreds of sailors which does not include other costs such as maintenance, fuel, logistics and so on. One Iranian Shaheed drone costs about twenty thousand dollars. Are they terribly sophisticated? No. But when fired by the hundreds coming from multiple directions, some are going to get through, no matter how sophisticated the air defense system is — and our sophisticated air defense systems also use very expensive radars and missiles.
The American military uses drones but they are big expensive ones with a long logistical tail. For example, a set of four MQ-9 Reaper drones (also known as the Predator B — a long range, long endurance, remotely piloted aircraft) plus the ground control station and satellite link systems, cost about $30 million dollars. We have lost several to the Houthis and Iranians as well in operational accidents. Each F-22 Raptor (the current all weather stealth fighter aircraft) costs about 150 million dollars. None of the aircraft have been built since 2011 with only 187 total put into service. However, looking at the total program cost per aircraft (which includes research, development, and start up costs) it comes out to about 340 million dollars per plane. It costs about 70,000 dollars per flight hour to use one. You get the idea, our modern arsenal is expensive. The Pentagon claims that the war against Iran cost taxpayers about 30 billion dollars to date. Most economists estimate that the actual figure is around one trillion dollars when adding up the cost of the operations in theater plus damage to bases and equipment plus the long term replenishment of depleted stockpiles and the personnel involved. So far we have lost thirteen service members killed in action and about five hundred wounded. None of that includes the impact on our domestic economy.
We must also remember that one of the keys to our economy and our role in it is freedom of the seas. Iran now knows that it can control the Strait of Hormuz regardless of any ceasefire or other agreement. That means they also control about 20% of the flow of the world’s oil, significant amounts of natural gas, fertilizer and other “must have” commodities. They will demand to be treated with respect or else they can threaten to disrupt the world’s economy and close it again. Or close it to those nations that are not friendly to them or otherwise refuse to meet Iranian demands. The rest of the world will have to deal with Iran or be prepared for threats to their economy. Iran is now a major player in the region and the world. Despite the Iranian navy “lying on the bottom” as Trump puts it, the U.S. could not keep the Strait open. We also were unable to provide the deterrence or protection we promised to our Gulf friends and allies in the region. Trump even threatened one of our strongest regional supporters. When asked this week about Oman working with Iran to control the Strait he said, “the Strait’s got to be open to everybody… nobody’s going to control it. We’re going to watch… over it… Oman will behave like everybody else or we’ll have to blow ‘em up.” Very reassuring.
Trump bullies and shouts, but in the end, what does he really talk about? Venezuela, Cuba, Greenland, Canada, Mexico, and other Western Hemisphere nations. He mocks NATO, our strongest allies ever, and refuses to commit to their defense. Where does that leave us? We are fast losing our status as a world power and are becoming a regional power. Russia, and especially China, are ready to fill the void.
All for what?
Mad King Donnie Disrupts The World
Posted: April 9, 2026 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Donald Trump, Genocide, Iran, IRGC, Israel, Nuclear Weapons, Persia, Persian Gulf, Russia, Strait of Hormuz Leave a commentOn Tuesday, Trump claimed that in accordance with an announced cease-fire with Iran that the Strait of Hormuz is open. On Thursday, officials from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) stated that “the Strait of Hormuz is not open. Access is being restricted, conditioned and controlled” by Iran. The map shows how Iran is rerouting shipping so that it can pass within the firing range of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards so that they can shake down the shippers for cash. From CNBC (AFP/Getty Images)
On one level, all of us should be thankful that Trump pulled his TACO routine (Trump Always Chickens Out) after posting on social media Tuesday morning, directed at Iran and its population of 93 million men, women and children that “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.” That is what scholars, pundits and most of the public call genocide. From the President of the United States. Speaking to the world in our name. The reaction from his fellow Republicans? Nothing. No accountability. No responsibility. No consequences. This is not okay. This is beyond shameful and is sufficient cause for getting rid of the whole lot of them. Our Constitution is soiled and our system of government is broken. Clearly the president is deranged. It is no longer a slogan or an exaggeration or any other mitigating definition. He is just plain crazy and he controls nuclear weapons. Two things are clear from his statement. First and foremost he has no moral compass, code of ethics or empathy for any human besides himself. Second, he clearly thinks he can do whatever he wants without restraint from anybody or any organization. If he wants it, he will order it, and expect it to be carried out. This should scare all of us right to our core. Thank goodness he chickened out. But let’s look deeper.
One hour before his stated deadline for Iran to end the war and open the Strait of Hormuz, Pakistani Prime Minister Sharif offered up a fig leaf to provide an exit ramp from doomsday. Both Trump and Iran accepted a two week ceasefire to allow diplomatic efforts to continue towards a more lasting settlement. In doing so, Trump said that the Iranian ten point plan for a negotiated settlement was a “workable basis on which to negotiate.” Iran took that literally, always dangerous when dealing with Trump. It appears that Trump probably did not know what was in the Iranian proposal. Here are the points in the plan:
- Cessation of the war on Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen.
- Cessation of the war in Iran with no time limit.
- Ending all conflicts in the region.
- Reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
- Establishing a protocol and conditions to ensure freedom and security of navigation in the Strait.
- Full payment of war reparations to Iran.
- Lifting sanctions on Iran.
- Release of the Iranian frozen assets held by the United States.
- Iran commits to not seeking possession of any nuclear weapons.
- Immediate ceasefire on all fronts upon the ceasefire announcement.
Looks a lot like Iran got nearly everything that they wanted. After scathing criticism stating that fact, Trump retreated. Now the administration is claiming that this is not the plan, instead there is a “secret” plan that they cannot reveal. If you believe that, you probably have a degree from Trump University.
For forty-seven years Iran has been the leading exporter of terrorism. There are no tears shed for the regime, its military or any of the other suppressors of the Iranian people. Iranians — Persians — have a long and storied history and culture. We will all rejoice when they rejoin the nations of the world as a stable, productive and welcomed member of society. This assault did not achieve that but it did make life worse for the average citizen of the country.
Israel, of course, is not honoring the ceasefire, whatever form it may be in. They continue to bomb Lebanon claiming that that war is different than the one on Iran. Iran refuses to fully open the the Strait until the Israelis stop their bombing. In short, it is a very confusing situation as I write. We do know, that for now, the United States has ceased attacking targets in Iran. That is about the only thing that is for sure. Oh, and Trump and his minions are claiming a “historic and overwhelming victory on the battlefield. A capital V military victory” as the former Fox News weekend host and current Secretary of Defense describes it.
The U.S. military did what they were asked to do. They significantly degraded the Iranian military in an overwhelming tactical win. But, strategically? Iran won big time. There is a famous conversation between adversaries in Viet Nam some years after the war. Harry Summers, an American colonel allegedly told a North Vietnamese counterpart, “You know, you never defeated us on the battlefield,” to which the Vietnamese colonel replied, “That may be so, but it is also irrelevant.” History is replete with examples of similar tactical losses leading to strategic victory. One can argue our most recent example was the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan.
Here is some of what Trump expected from Iran for our war of choice to cease and the assault on Iran to end. First, he called on the Iranian people to rise up and take control of their government. Then he simplified that to “regime change.” Then he called for “the complete and unconditional surrender” of the nation. Then it was to destroy Iranian stockpiles of enriched uranium. Then it was to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon. Then it was to keep their proxies (Hezbollah and the Houthis) from participating in the war. Then I lost track, but they ended with opening the Strait of Hormuz — which I will gently remind everyone was open to free navigation prior to the war. None of these objectives were achieved. In fact, in some ways, Iran is in better shape now. They have an even more entrenched and radical regime in control of the country. Sanctions have been lifted so Iran is making lots of money with oil prices so high. Iran is charging tolls for the use of the Strait of Hormuz — more money to the regime to rearm and rebuild, especially as Russia has openly supported Iran and reports indicate that China has been helping them as well.
(Distracting Note: Were I conspiracy theorist, I might opine that the entire reason for Operation Epic Fury was to help Vladimir Putin and Russia. Sanctions against Russia are lifted, allowing for them to purchase more weapons for use against Ukraine. Weapons and ammunition destined for Ukraine was diverted to the U.S. attack on Iran. Russia supplied targeting information on U.S. forces to Iran. Trump has all but broken NATO. He viciously denigrates our closest allies and even said this week that “I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too, by the way.”)
The war claimed thirteen American lives, with close to four hundred wounded. The cost — to date — is roughly 40 billion dollars. We have depleted stocks of weapons and ammunition that will take years to replace, especially high cost missiles and aircraft. (We know the U.S. has lost four F-15E [fighters], 1 A-10 [ground attack], 1 E-3 [AWACS], 2 KC-135 [tankers], 2 C-130 [special operations configured transports], 17 MQ-9 [sophisticated drones], 1 MH-6 [specialized little helicopter] and there are rumors of additional helicopters lost.) Thousands of civilians killed in Iran, Lebanon, Israel and around the Persian Gulf. Oil prices soaring impacting the world’s economy. And more. For what?
Are we better off than we were six weeks ago? Strategically, Iran is. We look weak, chaotic, unhinged and untrustworthy as the world wonders where Trump will next declare “the end of civilization” is at hand. Trump is attempting to end this war in the same manner he ends everything. Create a crisis, claim to be fixing it, and then walk away when it gets too hard and pronounce that its not his problem, someone else will have to clean it up.
This is not the end of our nightmare. It is only the beginning.
Amateur Hour Continues
Posted: March 7, 2026 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Treasury, Shiite, Strait of Hormuz, The Persian Gulf, Trump, Unconditional Surrender, Vladimir Putin, War Aims Leave a commentThe Persian Gulf. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
No one knows when the war in the Middle East will end. Government leaders continue to give multiple and often contradictory reasons for the attack and the strategic conditions that will end it. One thing is certain, we have a Commander-in-Chief that is unleashed, impulsive, and clueless. In his usual way of setting policy, and expecting it to be taken seriously, Trump set the terms of ending the war via Truth Social. In part he posted, “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” As if they needed more incentive, the Iranians will now fight to the bitter end. There will be no unconditional surrender unless Trump plans to literally kill nearly everyone in the country. As I have stated often in these spaces, wars only end when the loser chooses to end them. No matter how bad things are, they will continue to fight until the attacker goes home or there is a negotiated settlement. There have been no wars settled by unconditional surrender since World War II. As if setting policy via social media was not enough, Trump shows us just how unserious he is by also including in his post “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).” Because, of course.
Ever the clever one, Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s spokesperson, when asked about what unconditional surrender means said, “When he as Commander-in-Chief determines that Iran no longer poses a threat to the U.S. and the goals of Operation Epic Fury have been fully realized, then Iran will essentially be in a place of unconditional surrender whether they say it or not.” Please see the above paragraph. There will be no unconditional surrender, Trump will just say it and go home claiming victory. Consequences be damned because the Iranians will not accept that as a permanent outcome. When asked by Time magazine reporters whether we should worry about retaliatory terror attacks on our homeland Trump replied, “I guess.” He went on to say “We think about it all the time. We plan for it. But yeah, you know, we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die.” Well, that’s good to know.
Trump also claims that he will pick the next leader of Iran. Hubris or ignorance, you decide. Whichever you choose, he is of course fooling himself and trying to hoodwink us, the citizens of the United States in to believing that he somehow is the Master of the Universe. Let us remember that not only did Trump take out the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was also the spiritual leader for all Shi’ites. Saying that he will pick the next leader is akin to declaring that he will pick the next Pope. There are about 240 million Shia Muslims in the world (the largest sect with about 90% of all Muslims are the Sunni). The largest concentrations of Shi’ites are in Iran (about 68 million people), Iraq and Azerbaijan. There are also significant numbers of Shi’ites in Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan. To add to the equation, their leader was killed during Ramadan which takes place during the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, a holy month, and is believed to be the month where the Quran was revealed to the prophet Mohammed. None of them are going to let Trump pick the next leader.
The Washington Post reports that Russia is supplying targeting intelligence to Iran giving them the location of naval vessels, aircraft and other high value assets. The Secretary of the Treasury just announced that in order to keep the flow of oil going to Asia (the main buyers of oil coming through the Strait of Hormuz) the U.S. is issuing a temporary waiver for refiners, mainly in India, to buy Russian oil, which has been embargoed since Russia invaded Ukraine. So, let’s see, the longer the Strait remains closed, the more oil Putin can sell and thus save his nearly collapsed economy. And buy weapons to use against Ukraine. Are we sure Vlad doesn’t have something on his good friend Donnie? Nothing like acting in Putin’s interests to keep the war going while he makes money and helps to target Americans.
Meanwhile the disgraceful buffoon that calls himself the Secretary of Defense continues to strut and dance around while he brags about killing people. On a preview of an upcoming 60 Minutes interview he is asked about Russian involvement and said “we aren’t concerned about that.” He went on to say “the only ones that need to be worried right now are Iranians that think they’re gonna live.” Asked a similar question yesterday by a Fox News reporter Trump responded “What a stupid question that is to be asking at this time.” Such articulate and deep strategic thinkers. Recall that at a press conference this week the Secretary was asked about the American soldiers that were killed. He took the opportunity to berate the media for only reporting on the bad news in order to make Trump look bad. Because, of course, everything has to be about Trump.
One only has to know what the Secretary and the Trump administration think about the war right now is to look at what they are posting on social media. Most of their posts are memes splicing together scenes from video games, war movies and actual combat footage. Here is one example as reported in the Washington Post. “On Thursday, the White House also posted a video overlaying airstrike footage with the lyrics “Kaboom, kablow” from the viral rap song “Bazooka,” and another mixing clips of missile detonations with SpongeBob SquarePants. On Friday, the White House published another video referencing “Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas,” flashing the message “WASTED” — what the game’s players see when they die — atop missile footage showing trucks and people engulfed in flames.”
These are the people speaking for our nation. A school in Iran was bombed and killed dozens of elementary school girls and six Americans were killed in combat and our leaders think it is all a funny game.
Our military professionals are doing their job and doing it well. We pray that they are safe. Our government leaders are not only ignorant about the Middle East and amateurish in the formulation of strategy, but they also care little to nothing about our military men and women or the citizens of these United States.
Wag The Dog
Posted: February 25, 2026 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Aircraft Carriers, Ballistic Missile Defense, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, IRGC, Israel, Middle East, State of the Union, Strait of Hormuz, The Epstein Files, War Powers Act 1 CommentOn 19 February 2026, a banner displaying the face of Trump and a slogan appeared over the entrance to the Department of Justice (DOJ) building in Washington D.C. It appears that he is emulating his good friend Kim Jong Un. “Big Brother is watching you.” (Picture from Brendan Smialowski for Getty Images)
The president that campaigned on putting America first and criticized his predecessors for their military involvement around the world is preparing to use the military for the second time against Iran. So far, in the first year of his second term he has used military force in seven countries and threatened it in two more. The House of Representatives and the Senate have yet to approve any of his military actions despite the fact that Article I Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the exclusive power to declare war. The War Powers Act of 1973 requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops and limits their involvement to 60 days unless approved for longer by Congress. Trump refuses to meet even that bare minimum.
Trump thought he could bully the Iranians by massing the most combat power in the region since 2003 during the Second Gulf War. The Iranians have other ideas. Trump wants total elimination of their ability to stockpile “nuclear fuel” and they say it is for domestic power generation. Obama had a deal limiting the Iranians’ ability to process uranium which included on site inspections. Trump tore up that agreement in 2018 and is now asking for essentially the same thing as was previously settled. As always, he creates a problem, returns to the status quo ante, and then claims that he solved a crisis. Why would the Iranians or any other country trust anything that he promises?
Indeed, the U.K. (in particular Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean), the UAE, and Saudi Arabia refuse to allow the U.S. to launch attacks from their countries against Iran. Others, such as Qatar, Egypt and other Middle East countries are extremely hesitant to allow it. Some are refusing to allow US military aircraft to fly over their territory which makes for some very long flights to reach targets in Iran.
This will not be Venezuela. Iranian air defenses are in disarray following last year’s attack on their nuclear facilities, but they still have a strong military capability.
The first step in military planning is to determine the desired end state. What do we want to see happen? How do we know we won and can go home? Everything else flows from that. So far the Trump regime has been unable to articulate their specific goals in attacking Iran. In recent weeks they have been all over the map as to what they intend to accomplish. Last night’s State Of The Union address to Congress would have been the logical opportunity to explain to the American public why we are going to send our sons and daughters, husbands and wives into harms way. He barely mentioned Iran and then in only very vague terms.
Therefore the mission is not clear to me and without a clear mission, it is difficult to plan. Is it to knock out all nuclear capabilities? Supposedly, we already did that. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s primary international negotiator for everything (Calling Marco Rubio! Anyone seen the Secretary of State actually doing anything having to do with diplomacy?) said last week that “they’re probably a week away from having industrial-grade bomb-making material. And that’s really dangerous. So they can’t have that.” Where that analysis came from, no one knows. Trump himself continues to say that last year’s bombing attack on Iran by the U.S. and Israel “totally obliterated” all of their capabilities. Additionally, it is known that the Iranians currently have no weapons program to build a delivery system for a nuclear weapon even if they wanted to make one.
Is the mission to knock out the Iranians ballistic missile capability? Their missiles certainly pose a threat to our friends and allies in the region. However, it would be next to impossible to destroy all of their missile capability in one attack. It could only be done through a sustained campaign. The missiles are stationed all around the country and some are mobile. During the course of our campaign the Iranians could use them to retaliate against U.S. bases in the region or to attack infrastructure valuable to our friends in the area. Last summer they launched missiles against our base in Qatar in retaliation, however they provided advanced warning and precautions were taken to limit their impact. There is no guarantee the Iranians would only go for a face saving measure the second time around.
Is the mission regime change? Trump continually talks about knocking out Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Sometimes he talks about destroying the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the roughly 175,000 member branch of their Armed Forces that protect the regime and that is the real power supporting the Ayatollah in the country. To attempt that would result in a very long campaign, the kind of “forever war” that Trump swore he would never instigate. As we learned the hard way in Iraq and elsewhere, the people may want a change in leadership, but they do not want it replaced by the U.S. We are not “liberators” in their eyes, we are invaders.
How will we accomplish any of those potential missions? With an air campaign only? Sending troops into the country? Iran is a very large land mass with rugged terrain. It has a large and diverse population. Any ground attacks would be very costly in lives and treasure. Whatever the reasons or methods — and the president should explain why it is suddenly necessary to do something we have not seriously contemplated for decades — there is always the danger of planes getting shot down, or having mechanical issues or a dozen other things that could go wrong resulting in the death or capture of Americans. “Just because” is not good enough.
As it stands now, our aims are not clear and we should never commit military force when we do not know what we want them to do. Reports from several reputable news organizations indicate that senior military officers in the Pentagon are reluctant to use force against Iran. They understand that it will be no easy task. In retaliation Iran will create mischief (terrorism and missile attacks) in the region. They will try to close the Strait of Hormuz through which twenty percent of the world’s oil flows on ships. (Oil is a fungible commodity with a world-wide market so the impact on the price of oil will be felt everywhere.)
There are other human and practical costs. One of the carriers on its way to the region is the USS Gerald R Ford (CVN-78) — the other one now on station is the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) – which has been deployed for eight months already, much longer than the traditional six month deployment. The Ford is the same carrier that was pulled away from the Mediterranean Sea last fall to go to the Caribbean Sea, and now it is back to where it started without going home. It is a practical matter that people can only be stretched so far — not to mention the impact on their families — and maintenance on ship systems and aircraft can only be postponed for a limited time before things start to break. Additionally, our military is running low on certain types of ammunition. Missiles cannot be built in a day, a week, or a month. Think in terms of years to rebuild the stockpiles. Some we have given to Ukraine and Israel. A lot is expended to shoot down drones and ballistic missiles, especially in the Red Sea, that are constantly being fired by the Houthis in Yemen, which are themselves proxies for Iran. Surface to air missiles on the ships and those utilized by Army forces throughout the region such as Terminal High Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) and Patriot ballistic missile defense systems are in short supply. Similarly, we have a finite number of Tomahawk surface to surface missiles.
There may be another reason that Trump is threatening Iran. Despite his best efforts, he cannot make questions concerning the Epstein files go away. The net is getting ever wider and coming closer to him each day. The Epstein Files are not going away. They are like his shadow. They follow him everywhere and he cannot get away from them. When the king’s brother gets arrested, along with the British Ambassador to the U.S. he knows more fallout is coming. He is getting desperate to distract and turn our attention elsewhere. Iran anyone?







Recent Comments